Archive for the 'glossa/language' Category

rob bell wants to save christians

One of my favorite people, Mr. Rob Bell, has a new book out, written with a friend of his named Don Golden. It’s called “Jesus Wants To Save Christians: A Manifesto for the Church in Exile.”

What’s it about?

Glad you asked… here’s how it describes itself:

There is a church not too far from us that recently added a $25 million addition to their building.

Our local newspaper ran a front-page story not too long ago about a study revealing that one in five people in our city lives in poverty.

This is a book about those two numbers.

Well, then. You certainly have my attention.

RELEVANT recently did an interview with Rob about the book; here are a few of my favorite excerpts from that conversation:

+++++

In your book you say, “To preserve prosperity at the expense of the powerless is to miss the heart of God.” In what ways do you believe the church in America has “preserved prosperity” at others’ expense?

I think it’s wise to avoid generalities such as “the church” because whenever I hear people make sweeping generalizations about “the church” I always think “yes, but I know lots of churches where they are compassionate, where they are intellectually honest, etc…”Perhaps one obvious question a church can ask herself is “What percentage of our budget is spent on us and what is spent on others?

The Church has missed the heart of God by speaking out against abortion while keeping silent about war. Both are forms of violence used to preserve prosperity. Abortion is prenatal war against the powerless child. War is postnatal abortion that destroys innocent life. The kingdom is life for the fetus and life for the civilian. The church embodies this life in a world of expedient and preemptive killing.

How can churches aid in subverting the myth of redemptive violence?

At a personal level, gossip and slander and divisive language is evil to the core. It causes stress fractures in us, our churches, and our culture that destroy any sort of common good. On the larger, national level, “question war.” The Roman Empire had this phrase “peace through victory” that is simply not true. Yet people still use it today. Jesus taught a third way—not passive acceptance because “that’s just how things are,” and not violent revenge, but a third way. Where are the experts in third way? Where are those Christians so thoroughly versed in third way that world leaders call them in when things get dodgy to give courageous, innovative, creative, freedom-loving (!) counsel on how not to resort to the same old guns and bombs.

As the title of the book suggests, Jesus Wants To Save Christians. In your opinion, what are the biggest things we need saving from?

Boredom. Which is really despair in its non-caffeinated form. And boxes. Where we live in fear and where we put those who unsettle us.

You describe the plan of God for the church to be a gift to the world. Many people today would say that the church is anything but. What are some crucial changes that our churches need to make to become a Eucharist that is broken and poured out for the world?

1. Master the art of doubt. Faith needs it to survive.

2. Surrender the compulsive need to constantly remind people that according to your worldview you’re going to heaven forever when you die and they’re going to burn in hell forever.

3. Celebrate the good and the true and the beautiful wherever and whenever you find it regardless of the label it wears or the person it comes from or the place you found it. All things are yours.

4. Remember that the tax collectors and prostitutes loved to feast with Jesus and the religious establishment gossiped about him and dissected his teachings and questioned his commitment to orthodoxy and eventually had him killed. There’s a lesson for us there.

Post your thoughts below, or read the full interview here.

//

Email This Post Email This Post +++ Print This Post Print This Post +++ Now that's del.icio.us.

feedblitz’n

Hey everyone!

Thanks for hangin’ with me while I tried out a new blog delivery service, Feedblitz.

As of this posting, though, I’m going to ask you for permission to continue sending you emails (read: this is the last one you’ll receive, unless you subscribe).

I have no intention of keeping you on a mailing list you don’t feel like you signed up for; and although I know you all wanted to keep tabs on my writing, this might not have exactly been what you expected!

I truly hope you’ll stay subscribed. In order to do that, please click here or visit my blog and click the envelope in the upper right corner under my picture.

Thanks for reading!

//

Email This Post Email This Post +++ Print This Post Print This Post +++ Now that's del.icio.us.

strategist, catalyst, philosopher

(WARNING: There’s a whole lot of StrengthsFinder lingo in this post; if you’re finding yourself a bit confused, you probably should go check it out!)

I think I’ve always been on a search, a hunt — I’ve been looking for what it is that I am “supposed” to do, who I am “supposed” to be.

Being the borderline arrogant personality that I am (I don’t mean to be! It’s my Self-Assurance!), I’ve always thought that I had things — things including myself — pretty well figured out. Well, I’m gradually coming to terms with the fact that that I don’t really know much of anything… but I’m OK in the knowledge of that, at least.

Here in California I have learned more about myself than I ever even dreamed possible. Seriously. I attribute a great deal of that insight to the StrengthsFinder, but as with most things, you get out of it what you put into it. And, honestly, I have thought about it a LOT (some may call it obsession, but, whatever). Despite everything I’ve learned, though, I’m still not sure how to answer that first question: “What am I supposed to do? Who am I supposed to be?” (because for me they’re very much the same question).

Because of my Competition, Maximizer, and Significance themes (this is more StrengthsFinder talk, if you’re not familiar), I want to be The Expert in something so badly, I can almost taste it. And truthfully, I want to be the absolute best there is in the entire world. I think that makes things a bit tougher. Because how do you figure out what you’re better at than anyone else out of roughly six billion other folks? You got me!

But I’m trying to walk down this path; I stumble a lot, trip over my thoughts, and occasionally take wrong turns, but hopefully, If one were to look from a satellite view or something, they’d see that I’m at least heading in the right general direction, generally speaking.

It also doesn’t help that I’m reading this book, trying to get my head around what it means to be a writer, an author, and he reinforces the fact that in order for people to care about what you say, you have to become an expert in that field.

So I’m laying in bed this morning and these thoughts wake me from my slumber; what am I good at? I mean, really good at? I came up with a few things that I hope, again, are at least on the road to what I can become.

I think I’m really good at being a strategist. I can look at the variables of almost any given situation and weigh them almost instantly to determine the best possible outcome. I am good at making clarity out of chaos. I am also good at “connecting dots,” at synthesizing information (which I suppose also relates to strategy). I am also very good at being a catalyst, a firestarter, if you will. After the smoke clears, I often seem to be the one left holding the lighter, and to be honest, I kind of relish that responsibility. I love to start things, to influence people, change minds, elucidate concepts. Which brings me to my last realization: I am a philosopher, but not in the sense that we typically think of philosophy these days. I heard once that the study of Philosophy should have never become a collegiate major, or area of study unto itself, and I agree; for me the concept of true philosophy is actually about that notion of synthesis, connection. Philosophy is about learning how to connect everything else; as an end to itself it quickly becomes fairly narcissistic, nihilistic drivel. But real philosophy, as I see it, is about connectedness. And that, I am good at.

So, what to do, what to do…

Anyone else notice that epiphanies usually just lead to more questions? ;-)

Email This Post Email This Post +++ Print This Post Print This Post +++ Now that's del.icio.us.

“christmas,” not “holidays”

This morning I heard that Gap, Inc. is once again avoiding using the word “Christmas” in their stores/advertising/etc., opting instead for “Holidays.”

Normally this announcement probably wouldn’t have even registered as a blip on my radar, but unfortunately I heard about it from this article, which insists on labeling Gap as fostering a type of “christian censorship,” intent on somehow offending christians by insulting one of their most holy days.

Now, the irony abounds in an article like this, from an organization like this. The American Familiy Association, or AFA, is an organization that says it doesn’t support censorship but applauds responsibility. Unfortunately that’s only the case if the responsibility being expended coincides with their definition of it. If you think that using the word “Holiday” in your advertising is the responsible thing to do, as the word “Christmas” is fairly and truly associated with the christian faith and therefore may offend those of other faiths, well, I’m sorry — that’s not the kind of responsibility we’re talking about.

I don’t want to make too many generalizations, but if I may vent for a moment, this is the brand of rhetoric I see spewed from so-called “patriotic christian” persons far too often. We espouse an ideology of responsibility and connect it with an American ideal, when the truth of the matter is that the First Amendment in the Constitution (Freedom of Speech, etc.) doesn’t exist to protect the village voice; it protects the dissenting voice, the minority. It is wholeheartedly, unequivocally American to be considerate and responsible towards people of other faiths, opinions, lifestyles, etc., which is, as I see it, exactly what Gap, Inc. is trying to do.

The AFA’s Philosophical Statement clearly states that they want to achieve the “well-being of our country, in accordance with the vision of our founding fathers,” but I’m not sure it’s fair to put what they’re doing in that category. Of course it is within their rights as a private organization to stand for whatever they like (and they should do so, as they do, without apology!), but to lay claim to the definition of what responsibility means, or to warp the Founding Father’s intent for a land of free speech into an intolerant “you must think as I do” environment is certainly out of bounds.

I may have even let this go, normally; I don’t think I’m overly prone to rants about things — at least not as much as I used to be. ;-) But on my visit to the AFA’s page, I noticed that they’re also supporting boycotts of Ford Motor Company, because they are allegedly “supporting homosexual groups which are pushing homosexual marriage.”

Seriously?!?

Have these some 700,000+ people who have agreed to not buy anything (from one of the most American companies on the planet) ever met someone who works at Ford, like my wife’s father does? Have they ever been to Detroit and stared into the eyes of some of the tens of thousands of people who will lose their homes and their livelihoods because of the horrendous economic disaster that is happening there, due largely in part to the downturn of the auto industry that Detroit is built on?

No, I’m sure it’s much more important that we stop the gays. That’s probably more “American,” too.

Email This Post Email This Post +++ Print This Post Print This Post +++ Now that's del.icio.us.

spider-man 3 part 2

So, if you’re one of the three or so people who read my blog, you probably already know that i write freelance articles and movie reviews for RelevantMagazine.com. It’s been a lot of fun for me, especially as I’ve grown to appreciate the brilliance of the medium of film for communicating ideas of all kinds.

About two months ago, I reviewed Spider-Man 3. I rather liked the movie and, apparently, the rest of the world seriously did not, so upon reading the comments that got posted on my article I felt very much like, oh, what do they say… a whore in church. Yes, that’s it. (Of course, the fact that that phrase means what it does saddens me on another level, but that’s probably another day, another post, eh?)

I’m not going to retract anything I said about Spider-Man 3; I still agree with myself. I’d like to see the film again, actually, and will definitely buy it when it comes out on DVD (widescreen, please). But it has occurred to me that I did, perhaps, omit a few things from my review that should have been said. Forgive me, dear readers, for missing it the first time (and for it taking me two months to write this crap down):

THE PARAGRAPH MY REVIEW WAS MISSING:

Unfortunately, there were just too many villains. Yes, in a sense, it made the editing even more impressive (because despite the 80+, give or take, bad guys it was still quite understandable), but it’s also true that the overall movie would have been vastly improved by simplifying the myriad villain storylines. Specifically (sorry Thomas Haden), we could’ve done without Sandman. The effects were a lot of fun, if not slightly exaggerated, but I think almost every Spider-Fan would agree with me when I say, “Give us more Venom!”

Fin.

Email This Post Email This Post +++ Print This Post Print This Post +++ Now that's del.icio.us.

the alchemist & the matrix

Well, I finally read The Alchemist. I know, I know… it’s about damn time.

Hype is a funny thing, claiming fragments that don’t belong to it, buiding undue and unrealistic expectations. So it is a rare occasion when something actually supersedes its hype. Well, I will be the first to tell you: The Alchemist does. Anything positive you’ve heard about this book, it is better. Please go read it.

I also just finished a book called A Matrix Of Meanings: Finding God In Pop Culture and must highly, highly recommend it as well. It is written by two college professors in the Los Angeles area and illuminates facets of spirituality within pop culture that I had never considered before. If you are fascinated by cultural studies, sociology, art, pop culture, and theology you will love this book.

And that’s all the sunshine I’ve got for ya.

If you liked that, then try these…

kale alloiosis

a twentys-shaped-hole

soul

Email This Post Email This Post +++ Print This Post Print This Post +++ Now that's del.icio.us.

ann coulter hates you

Saint Ann

Or is that me?

Yeah, sorry, it’s me that she hates, not you.

Well, she might hate you too, actually.

I’d never heard of Ann before today. Well, actually, I suppose I probably have and it was buried somewhere in the subconcious catacombs of my mind, but before today I never made that leap from a lone name to associating ideologies.

Andrea Marchant, a good friend of mine is singing at a fundraiser event for some new venture called ZTV, or something, tonight in Los Angeles, and apparently Ann is the speaker. I learn of this event and, my curiosity successfully piqued, I meander over to anncoulter.com. There I find a number of fantastically scathing interviews, which, I gather, is what she’s known for, pretty much. She stands out on her rock of fundamentalism and whatnot and bashes the shit out of everybody else. (That’s about right, right?)

Well, that’s cool, I guess, if you’re into shit bashing. But the website made me sick to my stomach.

(It probably didn’t help that yesterday I saw Alex’s blog about Brannon Howse’s Piece Of Work.)

Is this the best thing to do with a life? Hate people and stir up dissention, particulary with people who, at least in part, are also trying to follow Jesus?

Whatever gets you through the night, Ann.

Email This Post Email This Post +++ Print This Post Print This Post +++ Now that's del.icio.us.

suspense

Taken from an interview with Wes Craven in The Denver Post, Friday, August 19, 2005

Q: You’ve said that “horror films don’t create fear, they release it.” Does suspense work in the same way?

A: Well, it deals with things that are deeply disturbing. But it’s more a psychological, spiritual thing. My feeling is people wouldn’t want to go into theaters and be scared if it wasn’t doing something good for them. And the only thing it could be doing for them is evoking fears and dealing with them in narrative.

Narrative is just one of the great, mysterious forces of the planet that human beings have devised to help them deal with some of these things that are so overwhelming. A good scary movie will take you through the worst that somebody what’s very imaginative could imagine and bring you out the other side with a character you’ve followed all the way through and who has survived it. I think that kind of journey is important.

If you liked that, then try these…

foxy voxy

temple of noise

music you should know!

Email This Post Email This Post +++ Print This Post Print This Post +++ Now that's del.icio.us.

monet refuses the operation

Doctor, you say there are no halos
Around the streetlights in Paris
And what I see is an aberration
Caused by old age, an affliction.
I tell you it has taken me all my life
To arrive at the vision of gas lamps as angels,
To soften and blur and finally banish
The edges you regret I don’t see,
To learn that the line I called the horizon
Does not exist and sky and water,
So long apart, are the same state of being.
Fifty-four years before I could see
Rouen cathedral is built
Of parallel shafts of sun,
And now you want to restore
My youthful errors: fixed
Notions of top and bottom,
The illusion of three-dimensional space,
Wisteria separate
From the bridge it covers.
What can I say to convince you
The Houses of Parliament dissolve
Night after night to become
The fluid dream of the Thames?
I will not return to a universe
Of objects that don’t know each other,
As if islands were not the lost children
Of one great continent. The world
Is flux, and light becomes what it touches,
Becomes water, lilies on water,
Above and below water,
Becomes lilac and mauve and yellow
And white and cerulean lamps,
Small fists passing sunlight
So quickly to one another
That is would take long, streaming hair
Inside my brush to catch it.
To paint the speed of light!
Our weighted shapes, these verticals,
Burn to mix with air
And change our bones, skin, clothes
To gases. Doctor,
If you could only see
How heaven pulls earth into its arms
And how infinitely the heart expands
To claim this world, blue vapor without end.

– LISEL MUELLER

Email This Post Email This Post +++ Print This Post Print This Post +++ Now that's del.icio.us.

new songs

Wow, I’m behind in posting about my new songs. I’m just too prolific for my own good (yeah right).

I’ll start with a song named “Letters.” I finished this tune about a month ago. If you’ve ever had a conversation with a songwriter, other than them probably annoying you with their constant analytical babble, you probably noticed that they make weird comments about “inspiration” and things like that. Well, I honestly don’t know where they come from, and this is the honest truth, but sometimes songs just, well, show up. In my head. I sit down at the piano and start playing this riff. A melody pops out and lyrics come with. It’s so bizarre, when I stop and think about it (which is quite often, because, well, I’m a stupid-analytical songwriter).

Next came a new love song. Sometimes I hear another person’s song and I think to myself “That’s a really cool rhythm” or “That’s a cool theme” or “That’s a cool concept” and it inspires me to do something different; this time it was a song by a guy named Jason Harwell and his song named “California.” It had a really fun 3/4 waltz-type thing going on with lots of reverb and slide guitar and I thought, “I should have a song that swings like that!” So now I do — and I gotta be honest, when you get to hear it, listen for the last verse I sing; I think it has some of the most poetic lyrics I’ve ever written. I named it “Light Up the Dark.”

I just finished a new song today, too - I called this one “Figments & Starshine” (ooh, so emo). Yes, I realize that Figment is the purple Disney dragon and “starshine” isn’t even technically a word, but you’re not allowed to laugh! This song is about a lot of things, I think, but for me it’s mostly about wondering if I’m ever going to be anything; if you’ll ever come to my concerts and buy one of my t-shirts and wait in line at a record store the day my CD comes out. It’s a tough thing being an artist, and I hate hearing “bellyaching rockstars whine and sob” as much as the next guy (thanks again Ben), but if you’re at my level (which is to say, virtually no level at all), you constantly wonder if you’ll ever be able to sustain your rent and food habits with what you’re really good at. And so there you go.

Anyway, enough of that! Come out to a show sometime (dates at www.joshallan.com) and I’ll play you some new songs!

If you liked that, then try these…

download my christmas song!

ask for the moon

broken

Email This Post Email This Post +++ Print This Post Print This Post +++ Now that's del.icio.us.