Archive for the 'allagei/change' Category

rob bell wants to save christians

One of my favorite people, Mr. Rob Bell, has a new book out, written with a friend of his named Don Golden. It’s called “Jesus Wants To Save Christians: A Manifesto for the Church in Exile.”

What’s it about?

Glad you asked… here’s how it describes itself:

There is a church not too far from us that recently added a $25 million addition to their building.

Our local newspaper ran a front-page story not too long ago about a study revealing that one in five people in our city lives in poverty.

This is a book about those two numbers.

Well, then. You certainly have my attention.

RELEVANT recently did an interview with Rob about the book; here are a few of my favorite excerpts from that conversation:

+++++

In your book you say, “To preserve prosperity at the expense of the powerless is to miss the heart of God.” In what ways do you believe the church in America has “preserved prosperity” at others’ expense?

I think it’s wise to avoid generalities such as “the church” because whenever I hear people make sweeping generalizations about “the church” I always think “yes, but I know lots of churches where they are compassionate, where they are intellectually honest, etc…”Perhaps one obvious question a church can ask herself is “What percentage of our budget is spent on us and what is spent on others?

The Church has missed the heart of God by speaking out against abortion while keeping silent about war. Both are forms of violence used to preserve prosperity. Abortion is prenatal war against the powerless child. War is postnatal abortion that destroys innocent life. The kingdom is life for the fetus and life for the civilian. The church embodies this life in a world of expedient and preemptive killing.

How can churches aid in subverting the myth of redemptive violence?

At a personal level, gossip and slander and divisive language is evil to the core. It causes stress fractures in us, our churches, and our culture that destroy any sort of common good. On the larger, national level, “question war.” The Roman Empire had this phrase “peace through victory” that is simply not true. Yet people still use it today. Jesus taught a third way—not passive acceptance because “that’s just how things are,” and not violent revenge, but a third way. Where are the experts in third way? Where are those Christians so thoroughly versed in third way that world leaders call them in when things get dodgy to give courageous, innovative, creative, freedom-loving (!) counsel on how not to resort to the same old guns and bombs.

As the title of the book suggests, Jesus Wants To Save Christians. In your opinion, what are the biggest things we need saving from?

Boredom. Which is really despair in its non-caffeinated form. And boxes. Where we live in fear and where we put those who unsettle us.

You describe the plan of God for the church to be a gift to the world. Many people today would say that the church is anything but. What are some crucial changes that our churches need to make to become a Eucharist that is broken and poured out for the world?

1. Master the art of doubt. Faith needs it to survive.

2. Surrender the compulsive need to constantly remind people that according to your worldview you’re going to heaven forever when you die and they’re going to burn in hell forever.

3. Celebrate the good and the true and the beautiful wherever and whenever you find it regardless of the label it wears or the person it comes from or the place you found it. All things are yours.

4. Remember that the tax collectors and prostitutes loved to feast with Jesus and the religious establishment gossiped about him and dissected his teachings and questioned his commitment to orthodoxy and eventually had him killed. There’s a lesson for us there.

Post your thoughts below, or read the full interview here.

//

Email This Post Email This Post +++ Print This Post Print This Post +++ Now that's del.icio.us.

pianos and prep time

Wanted to share an idea that has been rolling around in my head.

This might seem like common sense: the amount of talent in an individual (or group) is inversely proportional to the amount of preparation they need to create something excellent in their particular field of talent.

Simply put, the more natural ability you have to play the piano, the less you have to practice to get good.

Like I said; pretty common sense.

If this is logical, then the reverse would be equally true: the less talent you have (or a group has) at doing a particular activity, the more time it takes to present an acceptable product in that field.

Also fairly widely accepted. If you are bad at math, it takes you longer to do the homework.

As I parenthetically mentioned above, this fact can also be extrapolated to groups of people, and even further out to organizations as a whole.

This is where much of a company’s “culture” comes from. Where the natural proclivity of the leadership lies, therein you will find the ethos that trickles down and over time becomes engrained into the very fabric of that culture.

Apple, Inc. is innovative, tight-lipped, can be a bit bully-ish, and has a high appreciation for aesthetics — much like what I’ve heard about Mr. Steve Jobs.

The Virgin Group is daring, eclectic but a bit scattered, experimental, and adventurous — much like its founder, Sir Richard Branson.

These things are not coincidences.

The nonprofit I work with is, as a whole, almost unthinkably bad at two things (likely two heads of the same beast): organization and communication. These two things have plagued the staff and community for quite awhile now, and IMHO, even occasionally stymied our ability to welcome new people into the family.

Now, to be fair, it should be said that we are extremely good at being real, unscripted, highly adaptable, and organic.

But if the two facts I started with are true, why is it that we spend the LEAST amount of our time on organization and communication? Isn’t that just exacerbating our problem? The answer is that we are not intentionally making things worse, we are simply doing what comes naturally to us: as a group, we are very good at being chaotic and raw, so that’s what we do.

As you probably know, I am a huge proponent of strengths-based leadership, and focusing on what you are good at is definitely not a bad thing — unless you are ignoring your weaknesses. If our lack of organization and communication is truly keeping people from being engaged, then we have a problem.

Strengths-based philosophy does NOT mean ignoring weaknesses. It means managing them.

If we want to get better, it seems to me we have two possible responses.

1) We stop ignoring our weaknesses and spend more time “practicing.” Even if you don’t have much natural ability at playing the piano, there’s no question that if you practice 8 hours a day, you WILL get better… if only a little.

2) We stop ignoring our weaknesses and find somebody to do the things we’re bad at for us.

Also, what if your job REQUIRES you to play the piano, even if it’s just a little? Well, then if you want to keep doing your job, you better damn well practice.

I imagine that in our situation, we will need a mixture of these two solutions. There’s no way around it: leadership of any kind requires some amount of communication and organization. We simply can’t get around it. So, we better start practicing, and we better find some people to help us pick up the slack.

Strengths-based leadership requires leaders to have an accurate picture of reality; it demands that we stop ignoring what is common sense. Some of these truths may seem harsh, but maintaining an inaccurate, Pollyanna-ish paradigm won’t help anyone. It won’t help you, and it won’t help your followers.

Where is your organization weak? Where is your leadership weak? Do you need to spend some time with the piano or hire a session player? Maybe both?

//

Email This Post Email This Post +++ Print This Post Print This Post +++ Now that's del.icio.us.

winning the oil endgame

Armory Lovins is a cofounder of the Rocky Mountain Institute, and in this 20 minute talk somehow manages to make our dependence on oil seem like a second grade math problem in terms of easy solvability.

Hey, Somebody in Washington — hire this guy!

//

Email This Post Email This Post +++ Print This Post Print This Post +++ Now that's del.icio.us.

one of these people will be president

It’s no big secret that I think this fall’s choices are flimsy at best, and downright irresponsible at worse. But the other day I had what could probably be considered a fairly elementary realization…

One of these people — Barack Obama or John McCain — will be President of the United States of America.

I mean, I’m not saying that my heart won’t still be voting for Ron Paul. But in case you haven’t made up your mind about who you’re voting for, I’d ask you to take a look at this (I gotta be honest, it tipped me over the edge):

If you’d prefer to download the podcast and watch it at your leisure, click here.

//

Email This Post Email This Post +++ Print This Post Print This Post +++ Now that's del.icio.us.

big bailout #2

A few messages from Ron Paul on the economy, and Bush’s latest bailout plan.

//

Dear Friends,

Whenever a Great Bipartisan Consensus is announced, and a compliant media assures everyone that the wondrous actions of our wise leaders are being taken for our own good, you can know with absolute certainty that disaster is about to strike.

The events of the past week are no exception.

The bailout package that is about to be rammed down Congress’ throat is not just economically foolish. It is downright sinister. It makes a mockery of our Constitution, which our leaders should never again bother pretending is still in effect. It promises the American people a never-ending nightmare of ever-greater debt liabilities they will have to shoulder. Two weeks ago, financial analyst Jim Rogers said the bailout of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac made America more communist than China! “This is welfare for the rich,” he said. “This is socialism for the rich. It’s bailing out the financiers, the banks, the Wall Streeters.”

That describes the current bailout package to a T. And we’re being told it’s unavoidable.

The claim that the market caused all this is so staggeringly foolish that only politicians and the media could pretend to believe it. But that has become the conventional wisdom, with the desired result that those responsible for the credit bubble and its predictable consequences - predictable, that is, to those who understand sound, Austrian economics - are being let off the hook. The Federal Reserve System is actually positioning itself as the savior, rather than the culprit, in this mess!

• The Treasury Secretary is authorized to purchase up to $700 billion in mortgage-related assets at any one time. That means $700 billion is only the very beginning of what will hit us.

• Financial institutions are “designated as financial agents of the Government.” This is the New Deal to end all New Deals.

• Then there’s this: “Decisions by the Secretary pursuant to the authority of this Act are non-reviewable and committed to agency discretion, and may not be reviewed by any court of law or any administrative agency.” Translation: the Secretary can buy up whatever junk debt he wants to, burden the American people with it, and be subject to no one in the process.

There goes your country.

Even some so-called free-market economists are calling all this “sadly necessary.” Sad, yes. Necessary? Don’t make me laugh.

Our one-party system is complicit in yet another crime against the American people. The two major party candidates for president themselves initially indicated their strong support for bailouts of this kind - another example of the big choice we’re supposedly presented with this November: yes or yes. Now, with a backlash brewing, they’re not quite sure what their views are. A sad display, really.

Although the present bailout package is almost certainly not the end of the political atrocities we’ll witness in connection with the crisis, time is short. Congress may vote as soon as tomorrow. With a Rasmussen poll finding support for the bailout at an anemic seven percent, some members of Congress are afraid to vote for it. Call them! Let them hear from you! Tell them you will never vote for anyone who supports this atrocity.

The issue boils down to this: do we care about freedom? Do we care about responsibility and accountability? Do we care that our government and media have been bought and paid for? Do we care that average Americans are about to be looted in order to subsidize the fattest of cats on Wall Street and in government? Do we care?

When the chips are down, will we stand up and fight, even if it means standing up against every stripe of fashionable opinion in politics and the media?

Times like these have a way of telling us what kind of a people we are, and what kind of country we shall be.

In liberty,
Ron Paul

//

Email This Post Email This Post +++ Print This Post Print This Post +++ Now that's del.icio.us.

thoughts on oil addiction

Now that gas prices are “coming down” (yes, we feel just GREAT about $3.75/gallon… what!?) I don’t sense the same urgency in the American populace to fix this problem that existed when it was $5. Of course, this placation was expected by most and predicted by many, but that doesn’t change the fact that there is still a problem out there that was never solved. And it’s not fixed now, just because we are back to ignoring it.

I fear we are addicted to foreign oil, and maybe just oil in general.

But in the words of the immutable LeVar Burton, you don’t have to take my word for it! Please check out some or all of the links below.

//

T. Boone Pickens, the founder and chairman of BP Capital Management (which manages over $4 billion in energy-oriented investment funds) has created the Pickens Plan, which aims to develop clean energy solutions.

Here’s a great article from one of my favorite contemporary revolutionaries, Dr. Ron Paul: Big Government Responsible For High Gas Prices

Newt Gingrich has also thrown his thoughts into this discussion, and although I’m not convinced that more drilling will be a long-term solution, it does seem like a reasonable band-aid, considering our current economic challenges.

If you’re a reader, you know I’m a big fan of Chris Martenson; he’s a very level-headed proponent of financial literacy. Check out his very important explanation of what “peak oil” really is — apparently, I had no idea! (This video may take a moment to load.)

In my quest for the truth, I came across a documentary called A Crude Awakening: The Oil Crash. This film is so obviously targeted towards proving its premise — namely, that there will be an oil crash — that it’s earned a bit of skepticism from me (as I’m sure you’ve noticed, it is increasingly hard to decipher truth from propaganda). Nonetheless, it is very interesting and quite well-made.

(The only free version I could find online has subtitles of some language I don’t know, which isn’t saying much as I barely have a handle on English.)

There’s also an interesting intersection of the “climate crisis” with our oil addiction. Check out WE:

There’s no question this is a complex issue with many moving parts, but I think we all know that it won’t be solved by ignoring it. And it most likely won’t be solved by the fatcat baby boomers who actually have the power to help, as they have proven time and time again that they are more than happy to leave their problems to us when they leave this world. (I’ll go into more detail on that issue some other day.)

I know I’m not really offering many — if any — real solutions in this post, but I figure awareness is a good start!

//

If you liked that, then try these…

no/yes on prop 8

sick

pick a camp, start a fire!

Email This Post Email This Post +++ Print This Post Print This Post +++ Now that's del.icio.us.

are you registered to vote? (who knows!?)

Now, I am not endorsing Obama (not that any of you particularly care), but I have been wanting someone to create this website for YEARS, so kudos.

To use their verbiage, it’s a one-stop site to check your registration status, register to vote, look up early-vote information for your state, apply to vote absentee, or even find your polling place.

(Now if we could only teach McCain how to spell I-N-T-E-R-N-E-T…)

//

If you liked that, then try these…

kale alloiosis

winning the oil endgame

not finished yet

Email This Post Email This Post +++ Print This Post Print This Post +++ Now that's del.icio.us.

the end of the innocence

Photo by djwhelan. Essay by Bob Lefsetz: July 3, 2008

They said life would never be the same after 9/11.

But somehow it was.

Sure, the government kept telling us to be aware of terrorist attacks, but despite some anthrax being mailed around in the weeks after the Twin Towers fell, nothing ever happened. Sure, we ultimately had to take off our shoes as we went through airport security, but life was surprisingly just like it had always been. Citizens shopped as our President urged them to. Kids went to school, parents bought SUVs and life wasn’t much different than it was in the nineties.

Until a couple of months ago. When gasoline suddenly spiked. When suddenly a jaunt to buy a quart of milk, to rent a DVD, was no longer a mindless decision, but something to be debated. Was it worth the cost of the gas?

We’ve been living in ignorance for far too long. Thinking some men in white robes were looking out for us. But they just turned out to be profiteers, paying lip service to bettering society, but really only interested in lining their pockets. Now, to be an average citizen is to contemplate one’s future. One’s economic future. No one’s worrying about whether a bomb is going to hit their city, rather whether they’ll have enough money to put food on the table.

The airlines are collapsing. Even Toyota took a hit, while GM heads toward possible bankruptcy. America’s fate may no longer be intertwined with the world’s largest car manufacturer, but if your corporate institutions are struggling, the effect is felt by people who don’t even own an automobile.

We no longer produce the steel in our cars, our clothes are made overseas and it seems the only thing we make is money. And, our financial institutions are not even that good at that. Bear Stearns had to be rescued for the good of the overall economy. While we were out fighting terror, making the world safe for democracy, we lost a bunch of our freedoms and America lost a great deal of its power.

China owns not only many of our buildings, but a ton of our debt. Our fate is inextricably hooked to this eastern country. They could bring our economy to its knees instantly. And, for all our efforts in the Middle East, Iraq is still not secure and Afghanistan is in turmoil. But what hurts most is the American people. Without pensions and health care. With more bills than money.

It’s almost beyond blame. We’re in a quagmire. The only question is how to get out. Whether to stay the course or try something new. Then, the man standing for change abruptly changes his positions and we feel that the only people looking out for ourselves is us.

Drink that beer, eat that hot dog, enjoy that parade. Have a good Fourth. But know that finally, everything truly is different. Whether it be natural disasters caused by global warming or the inability to afford a cross-country trip. The American way of life has taken a hit.

We’re all in this together. That inner city gang member is not far removed from the person flying in the private jet. No one is immune. We’re all members of society. How do we change for the better?

I don’t know.

But it’s time we started speaking the truth.

I’d hope the politicians could achieve this.

But the politicians always follow the artists. The artist, unencumbered, speaking from his heart, leads the way.

In the name of lifestyle, in the name of riches, our musical artists have abdicated their responsibility. And somehow the blame has been put upon the public, for stealing their wares, denying the fat cats their profits. The movie studios abolished reality long ago, and the television outlets have manufactured a false reality to sell to a numb public, just looking for a little release.

It’s palpable. Something’s changed. And there’s no easy solution. Gas is not going back down to three dollars a gallon, never mind two. There’s a cloud over our everyday activities. And we’ve got no confidence positive change is in the wind, never mind achievable. They tell us to party like it’s 1999, but those days are long gone.

Driving home from the doctor in the fading heat of a long summer day I heard Don Henley’s “The End Of The Innocence” on the radio. I remembered 1989, when the record was ubiquitous. When MTV still played videos and everybody with an established career sold millions of albums. When my wife left our home behind. In the shock of that event, the only thing that soothed me was music. I drove around pushing the button, longing to hear “The End Of The Innocence”, longing to feel rooted, connected to something.

I don’t need a bigger house. I don’t need two dollar a gallon gas. I jus need to feel connected, to feel that I’m not crazy, that other people are freaked out too, are shocked at what’s happened to our country. I need the musicians to speak the collective truth. To put words and sounds to what we feel. To point us in the proper direction. Because I’m lost.

Subscribe to the Lefsetz Letter at Lefsetz.com.

//

Email This Post Email This Post +++ Print This Post Print This Post +++ Now that's del.icio.us.

feedblitz’n

Hey everyone!

Thanks for hangin’ with me while I tried out a new blog delivery service, Feedblitz.

As of this posting, though, I’m going to ask you for permission to continue sending you emails (read: this is the last one you’ll receive, unless you subscribe).

I have no intention of keeping you on a mailing list you don’t feel like you signed up for; and although I know you all wanted to keep tabs on my writing, this might not have exactly been what you expected!

I truly hope you’ll stay subscribed. In order to do that, please click here or visit my blog and click the envelope in the upper right corner under my picture.

Thanks for reading!

//

Email This Post Email This Post +++ Print This Post Print This Post +++ Now that's del.icio.us.

lite-brites, sisyphus, and expecting the best

When in a position of leadership, how much does a leader’s lack of faith in a subordinate actually create their downfall? Is there some kind of derivative of a self-fulfilling prophecy that happens here?

Or, to put it another way, will I, as a leader, only ever get as much as I expect out of the folks I try to lead? Is there some kind of projected glass ceiling of progress or productivity that I fabricate over their heads?

Conversely, can a leader’s unwavering belief in a person actually help propel them towards success?

It seems plausible that this would be the case; I personally have seen a variety of situations when it appears as though a protege simply needs someone else to believe in them… and, perhaps most, to believe in them even when they can’t believe in themselves.

I am hopefully always learning more about myself. It is one of my constant projects: to figure out why I act the way I do. One thing I have learned is that I’m so confined within my own skin that it’s often a Sisyphean battle to even understand WHAT I’m doing half the time, as most of my movements have become completely rote programming. But every once in awhile something breaks through, and a light bulb turns on.

I imagine I’m like one of those Lite-Brite machines from the 80’s… eventually — just maybe, someday — I can light up enough LED’s to actually get a complete picture of me.

At the church I work with, we’re currently looking for a person to take over our kids ministries. I’ve learned that I have an overwhelming tendency to be extremely optimistic when it comes to people (i.e. I always think they can accomplish great things, often more then they may even think), but at the same time I’ve learned that such a myopic view of only seeing “potential” and not necessarily “reality” can also have a dangerous edge. I know how crucial it is to have the “right people on the bus” and that making a hasty decision on the front end is a very costly error, in more ways than just financially.

But as we look to add people to our staff, or to grow the participants we already have for that matter, isn’t it more dangerous to set expectations too low, instead of too high?

In any kind of relational setting, be it an organization or a friendship or a marriage, isn’t there just something about the complete audacity of hope (to quote that other guy); hope that each person involved can change and grow and become more than they currently are?

Isn’t there just something grand about always looking for the best in people instead of expecting the worst?

//

Email This Post Email This Post +++ Print This Post Print This Post +++ Now that's del.icio.us.