Archive for the 'alethia/truth' Category

adventures in hollywoodland

It’s not really a big secret that I had a pretty hard time with LA when we first moved here, over two years ago.

Now that I’m older and obviously so much wiser (well, older at least… 27 on Thursday! Eek.) I know there’s good and bad in pretty much everything. The trick seems to be hanging on to as much of the good as we can.

Los Angeles has grown on me (kind of like a fungus) over the past couple years. I mean, let’s face it; there are things you can do here that you can’t do in most cities. If you play your cards right, you can get paid to do such fascinating things such as:

  • Play video games
  • Life coach aspiring Hollywood’ers
  • Spend a week chasing down a Kim Jong-Il lookalike
  • Sit in a room all day long writing jokes
  • Seriously, it’s crazy. (And if you have others I should add to the list, post me a comment!)

    But for all its magic, Hollywood continues to drag around its share of baggage. There is an addiction to vanity here that borders on dangerous. It’s repulsive to me, mostly because most of the time, it’s completely invisible. Our LA obsession with fashion and style has bought us some pretty cool-lookin’ folks, but what’s never displayed is the destruction it causes behind the scenes.

    Whether we’d ever admit it or not, us Southern Californians are constantly in comparison mode when it comes to “the look.” We are constantly renovating some kind of fashionista Potemkin village, adding on wings and digging out pools, to eternally prove that we’re “enough,” and that we’re really worthy to hang with the rest of the wannabes. It’s like impersonating some sick Ken & Barbie Beach Village, all the time, everywhere.

    Frankly, it’s exhausting.

    I know some people are more acutely tuned to this pressure than others; and sadly, my wife and I definitely fall in the “squeezed” category. For us, fashion has always been about communication; to an extent, at least, the way we dress tells a story about who we are (or who we’d like to be). Even before we moved to such a façade-conscious place, we cared about our presentation… but again, it’s because clothes aren’t just about presentation for us.

    In Hollywoodland, though, these expectations are dangerous because they have become an assumed thing… an undercurrent. It’s assumed that we’ll spend $250 on a pair of jeans, beause, seriously, who doesn’t? Ladies, you simply must have 600 pieces of jewelry accessories, and just as many shoes, because — I mean, REALLY — God-forbid you can’t match your belt. (I really do feel for you ladies; this game has almost an infinite number of rules just for playing on Team Girl.)

    No, LA’s not all bad. But it’s not all good, either.

    Honestly, I’d like to import some reality every couple months. If somebody from Colorado can come down and slap me in the face with a pair of flip-flops or something once in awhile, that’d be great.

    //

    If you liked that, then try these…

    triage or die

    tears

    pick a camp, start a fire!

    Email This Post Email This Post +++ Print This Post Print This Post +++ Now that's del.icio.us.

    the crash course

    My good buddy Zach turned me on to this guy; his name is Chris Martenson, a Ph.D. scientist specializing in neurotoxicology who has shifted his empirical, research-based mind over to economics. He’s currently developing an online version of what he calls “The Crash Course” on topics like money, debt, growth, investing, assets, demographics, etc., and the social and political triggers and effects that intersect at all those points.

    Obviously my Connectedness just eats this kind of stuff up, but I wanted to make you aware of it, because I think there is information in here that absolutely everyone living in America right now, in 2008, simply must have.

    This goes back to a statement I made in one of my previous posts, where I said that “All that is necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing,” quoting Sergei Bondarchuk. Well, in this case, the evil is the greed and complete lack of foresight (or complete disregard for the future) of our last few American generations, and how their inconsideration for, frankly, US (who are, of course, the future of this country) will pose myriad challenges over the next 20-30 years, specifically in regards to our economy and general way of life.

    I’ve posted his intro video below to give you a taste for his style. Please consider taking the time to watch a few or all of Chris’s video segments. Some of them may be slightly uncomfortable, but I’m guessing that more so, they will “connect the dots” for feelings you’ve had gliding under the surface for awhile now.

    P.S. I’d love to hear your thoughts on any of his videos, if you’d like to post a comment below! What really surprised or shocked you??

    //

    Email This Post Email This Post +++ Print This Post Print This Post +++ Now that's del.icio.us.

    the millennial melee

    “Talkin’ ’bout my generation…”

    An increasing topic of interest to me (and, apparently, the rest of the world) is the melee that seems to surround my peoples. I’m sure you know many of us, but we go by a number of names, including Generation Y, Echo Boom, Net Generation, Generation Me, and Millennials.

    In their recent book Connecting to the Net.Generation, Reynol Junco and Jeanna Mastrodicasa found a few interesting facts about us by taking a survey of 7,705 US college students (info taken from my favorite online source, Wikipedia):

  • 97% of us own a computer
  • 94% of us own a cell phone
  • 76% of us use Instant Messaging (and 15% of us IM users are logged on 24 hours a day/7 days a week)
  • 34% of us use websites as their primary source of news
  • 28% of us author a blog and 44% read blogs
  • 49% of us download music using peer-to-peer file sharing
  • 75% of us college students have a Facebook account
  • 60% of us own some type of portable music and/or video device such as an iPod
  • I recently posted a blog entry about the apparent ignorance of Baby Boomers (and I’m really referring to the managing workforce in general when I say that) in regards to Gen Y. But today I came across this article from the Harvard Business School, and wanted to share it as it seems someone is finally paying attention to our good qualities!

    How Will Millennials Manage?
    by Jim Heskett

    Anonymous Commenter #4 pretty much sums us up, I think:

    I am ambitious but not overly committed. I prefer to work as a consultant because I am not chained to one company. I am a problem solver by nature, and I want to get immediately to the problem solving. I’m not interested in meaningless titles, mine or anyone else’s, and I’m not willing to enslave myself to attain a position with a great title and no depth of purpose. I don’t want the appearance of success. I want the integral satisfaction of succeeding. I want to make a lot of money, but only if I have time to spend it, and I’m more interested in health care and vacation than bonuses that I’d have to work too much to get and work too much to enjoy.

    My family and my pursuit of knowledge for knowledge’s sake are more important to me than any particular job, with any particular company. I have confidence in myself, my marketability, and my ability to put my nose to the grindstone when it is necessary. I’m interested in being as efficient and productive as possible, but not every second of every day, and not under someone else’s thumb.

    Are you a Millennial (born between or around 1980-2000)? Does this description fit you like it does me??

    //

    Email This Post Email This Post +++ Print This Post Print This Post +++ Now that's del.icio.us.

    triage or die

    I’ve been thinking about the concept of “triage” a lot lately.

    I understand that being a borderline hypochondriac doesn’t exactly qualify me to talk about triage as a medical concept, but I think as a more general idea, the concept of triage has a lot to offer. Allow me to explain…

    Wikipedia, the most reliable source of information in the world, defines “triage” as:

    A process of prioritizing patients based on the severity of their condition so as to treat as many as possible when resources are insufficient for all to be treated immediately. The term comes from the French verb trier, meaning ‘to sort, sift or select.’

    Doctors use this concept to sort through their “work”, so to speak, to accurately prioritize what should be happening now, and what should not.

    This strikes me as a key life concept.

    What if we were to broaden the idea of triage into a more general frame?

    I am becoming more and more convinced that, to be truly effective human beings, we must constantly be in a state of awareness, in a position to persistently perform triage on our own lives, to prioritize and systematically assess what we’re doing with the time we have.

    We all get the same amount of time every day (roughly 24 hours, last I checked), but for some reason, some folks we meet are highly successful — however we choose to define the term — and some are not.

    Why?

    People that aren’t cutting it suck at triage.

    For some reason (or many reasons) these people can’t sort through the myriad details of their lives to be able to separate events and prioritize things. They are either frighteningly lost in the complexity of life or they choose to ignore the fact that they have some control over their impending future.

    Part of this I can understand; it is easy to get stuck on autopilot in life, to sail through without ever really taking a look at what we’re doing or where we’re going. But the simple and often devastating fact is that what we’re doing is going to take us somewhere — and it may not be where we want to go.

    I also understand it because, frankly, triage is hard. It’s hard to try to take a more objective stance on our lives. It’s a lot of work, and requires a lot of thought.

    Sometimes I wonder if people think they are saving themselves trouble by coasting, by just dancing through life. It may work for awhile, but it seems to me that at some point, the gig will be up and we will have to start making decisions. (Sidenote: maybe this is the real curse of work; the fact that entropy exists and we can’t just “be.” Hm; something to ponder another day.) The reality I live in says that gardens need tending, cars need maintenance, flowers need to be watered, and people need to be loved; it’s almost like the universe is built with a incessant obligation for interaction. There’s an intrinsic cause and effect relationship built into the fabric of reality, and like it or not, I think that means us, too.

    I think that we must broaden our personal skill base in order to include the art of triage. Prioritizing is one of the essential functions we perform as humans, because it the sister of “choice.” We cannot make decisions without prioritizing them, but that is exactly what many of us try to do. We have become chronic avoiders, letting life slap us in the face as we walk through. We think that we are somehow saving ourselves trouble by evading personal triage, but in fact, we are killing ourselves.

    The truth is that for the good of our humanity we must learn the art of triage, or we will never be fully human.

    //

    If you liked that, then try these…

    two kingdoms

    die, wal-mart, die

    ann coulter hates you

    Email This Post Email This Post +++ Print This Post Print This Post +++ Now that's del.icio.us.

    the audacity of baby boomers

    I’ve been intrigued by this idea of Life/Business Coaching for awhile now, and had the distinct pleasure of attending a meeting of the Professional Coaches And Mentors Association (PCMA) in Santa Monica last night.

    This was my second experience as a PCMA guest. Every month they get together with a different speaker/presenter who talks about an issue that is currently affecting the business landscape, specifically in regards to Coaching. They feed us steamed zucchini, some kind of sauced-up chicken, and chocolate-oatmeal cookies. It’s nice. Last night’s topic was on the notion of “succession planning” and how coaches can partner with the idea of legacy building in organizations to be more successful. Now, this is fine and dandy (and frankly, spot-on). But what I found nearly humorous was the audacity of all the baby boomers.

    The whole room was boomers, almost. I was there, and the two grad-school-aged daughters of the speaker were there, so we threw the balance off a bit, but mostly: middle-aged know-it-all’s.

    Now, don’t get me wrong; I have nothing against these folks. In fact, I rather like them so far (I’ve only been there twice, forgoodnesssake). But, holy shit, are they (as an age group, not as a club) subtly arrogant.

    I’m not even sure they know this, to be honest.

    Ever talked to a baby boomer? They just have all the answers for everything, don’t they!? They speak of succession, and all the while, just under the surface — if you pay attention — you’ll notice a current, an undertow. If you can find it, the subliminal message will explain just how gosh-darn lucky all we Gen X&Y’ers will be if we can somehow get the Blessed attention of a Boomer long enough for them to give a crap about us. They just have the experience of the ages, you know; consummate and comprehensive. They lived through a bunch of wars, you know. (Not sure if you knew that.)

    I don’t want to sound like too much a cynical and angry twentysomething, but I found all the talk of succession planning rather one-sided, if you will. In my mind, these folks are making a pretty big assumption: that we want their jobs. In my experience… not so much. At least not the way they do them, all work and no play.

    I also find it fascinating to listen to groups of older people talk about younger people, because there’s always this aire of superiority floating about. “Oh, those darn kids! If they only knew how stupid they are!” Little do they know that I’m sitting in the back, thinking, “Oh, those stupid old people! If they had the humility to actually ASK some of us younger folks, maybe they could learn how to keep their companies from dying.”

    Like I said, I’m rather fond of my new almost-friends over at PCMA, and I’m certainly exaggerating to make my point. But, I honestly did find myself wishing they’d have even considered (or mentioned!) asking some upcoming business leaders to give their take on upcoming challenges. I, for one, would love to be part of that discussion. But, again, too often with boomers the discussion is never a discussion at all… it’s a lecture.

    Of course, at the end of the day, it’s always a give and take. There is much we younger folks can learn from those older and (sometimes) wiser. And there are always exceptions to the generalization. I just find the consistent arrogance of the executive class repellent, and hope that someday when I inherit their status, I can remember to keep an ear open to the leaders of tomorrow.

    P.S. For more commentary on this topic, check out Boomsday by Christopher Buckley.

    //

    Email This Post Email This Post +++ Print This Post Print This Post +++ Now that's del.icio.us.

    creativity and spirituality

    Wanted to share a video from a professor at a music conservatory I attended back in the day. His name is Tom Willett and his thoughts are eloquent and often quite brilliant; I hope you like this as much as I did!

    //

    Email This Post Email This Post +++ Print This Post Print This Post +++ Now that's del.icio.us.

    kale alloiosis

    WOW, it’s been a crazy week. Been working a lot… and on top of it, I’ve got the nastiest head cold this side of the Rockies. Gross.

    While I know there aren’t hoards of people waiting with baited breath for me to write another blog entry, I still like to stay in touch. Maybe it’s my communication addiction, but unless I’m somehow interacting with “the world” (that’s you!) I just don’t seem to feel alive. So here we are; back in the game!

    I got this quote in a newsletter Brian McLaren sends out and wanted to share it! Enjoy.

    An Eastern Orthodox friend recently sent me this beautiful quote from Facing the World, by Archbishop of Albania Anastasios Yannoulatos.

    In its Orthodox ideal… Christianity is still defined by its holistic vision: an approach toward and account of life that embraces everything, life in its entirety, in all its dimensions and meanings.

    This all-encompassing vision was elaborated… by the three ‘ecumenical teachers:’ Basil the Great, Gregory the Theologian, and John Chrysostom. With all their being they lived the Bible’s message that everything is reiterated in Christ…and they struggled for an all-encompassing change in human affairs: a ‘change for the better’ (kale alloiosis), [a] transformation of everyone and everything, which Christ initiated in both the external and the interior realms.

    Now that’s what I’m talking about.

    //

    Email This Post Email This Post +++ Print This Post Print This Post +++ Now that's del.icio.us.

    the triumph of evil

    “All that is necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing”

    Nobody seems to be sure who actually said this quote (and by “nobody” of course I mean The Internet), but it was probably Russian filmmaker Sergei Bondarchuk, from the dialogue of his epic production of Tolstoy’s War and Peace, and not Edmund Burke, whom it’s normally attributed to.

    Quotes and authors aside, it’s one my favorite thoughts, and I think it’s powerfully true.

    The other day I watched a documentary called ENDGAME: Blueprint for Global Enslavement, by Alex Jones. It’s a bit long, but definitely presents some very interesting theories, that, I’m afraid, might not be just theories. Essentially it asks the question: Is An International Finance Conspiracy Driving World Events? Of course, according to the film, the answer is a resounding YES. Jones claims the driving force of the planet is an exclusive group of elites called the Bilderberg Group, who are intent on creating some form of “New World Order” by radically downsizing the global population, erasing national sovereignty, manipulating the masses, and instituting an autonomous and essentially all-powerful one-world government.

    Now, at first glance this all seems a little too “Left Behind” for my liking, to be honest. Though I’ve only now been on the earth for a quarter-century or so, I’m sure there have been interesting, imaginative folks concocting schemes and dreams of world domination since long before I got here.

    I’ve seen my share of Bond movies, too, thankyouverymuch.

    But what if? What if it’s even partially true? What then?

    The idea of a maleficent world dictatorship seems so crazy, so out there, so “never gonna happen in our lifetime” that it’s easy for us to write it off without even really considering it. (And then there’s always the wonderful deterrent of being labeled a Conspiracy Theorist, which we all know is right up there with people who bark, make various animal noises, chase parked cars and whatnot.) The other trick with considering an idea like this is simply the fact that it’s so BIG. There are so many threads of thought that play into a theory this vast: finance, economy, politics, technology, philosophy, marketing, media, and history — just to name a few. It’s difficult to wrap our minds around any small combination of these topics, much less envisioning all of them merging to form a coherent singular plan.

    I’m not yet convinced that the ideas in ENDGAME or Zeitgeist are completely true, but I think they are plausible enough that we should watch them carefully and consider what they have to say.

    Anymore, my concern isn’t as much that we, as a human race, will make horrible decisions when faced with tough choices. What worries me is that, because of the effortlessness with which the mainstream media seems to control our population (Election 2008 anyone?), we won’t bother to get an accurate picture of what’s really happening around us and therefore won’t even have the option to make good decisions. If we don’t pay attention, it’s likely that we’ll never have even known the real truth of the situation.

    I also fear that our liberties could slowly be eroded to the point that choices will be made for us before we even hear the options.

    When it comes down to it, if a group like Bilderberg really is trying to puppetize the human race, the issue is really all about choice, is it not? Our ability to make up our own minds about what we think? Our freedom to make our own decisions?

    There is a component in all elitist philosophies that claims that “they” can make decisions for us better than we can for ourselves (and frankly, looking at the stupidity and ignorance of the public, sometimes I wonder if they’re right). But I have to believe that our ability to choose is a big part of what makes us human (a topic I talk more about in my book, blur).

    In The Matrix Reloaded there’s a fascinating discussion concerning the notion of “choice” between the Merovingian and our group of heroes:

    Merovingian: You are here because you were sent here; you were told to come here, and you obeyed. It is of course, the way of all things. You see there is only one constant, one universal; it is the only real truth: causality… action… reaction; cause and effect.

    Morpheus: Everything begins with choice.

    Merovingian: No. Wrong. Choice is an illusion, created between those with power…and those without. Look there, at that woman. My God, just look at her. Affecting everyone around her, so obvious, so bourgeois, so boring. Watch, you see, I have sent her a dessert… A very special dessert. I wrote it myself. It starts so simply… Each line of the program creating a new fate, just like poetry. First, a rush; heat. Her heart flutters. You can see it, Neo, yes? She does not understand why; Is it, the wine? No. What is it, then, what is the reason? And soon it does not matter. Soon the why and the reason are gone; and all that matters is the feeling itself.

    And this is the nature of the universe. We struggle against it; we fight to deny it, but it is, of course, pretense; it is a lie. Beneath our poised appearance, the truth is: we are completely… out of control.

    Causality. There is no escape from it. We are forever slaves to it.

    Are we really slaves to the heartless cause and effect of the universe?

    Or can we create the future?

    Two days ago the Bush administration proposed a massive overhaul of the United States’ financial regulatory system. Does anyone understand why the Fed should have any more power over anything? Oh yes, that’s right — since they’ve done such a fantastic job so far, with the whole Great Depression thing, the endless stock market roller coasters, and presently, one of the most frightening impending recessions of all time. Yes, let’s give them a RAISE.

    My goodness; it all just seems so decidedly anti-American. Didn’t we leave England to cast OFF the role of all-encompassing government? Maybe we’re not centralized under a “king” this time around but, holy shit; if we’re not making the brilliant, revolutionary idea of America into some kind of socialist nightmare I don’t know what we’re doing.

    These little, noiseless choices are creating our future, whether we can see it now or not. And it’s things like this news about the Fed that really make me wonder if Alex Jones and the Zeitgeist folks aren’t on to something.

    For whatever it’s worth, I encourage you to take the time and do some research. If there will be a war fought on American soil, it will most likely be a battle of marketing, fought over finances and economics, and waged for the subjugation of your mind. No bombs will be dropped, but our lives will certainly be lost if we thoughtlessly hand over our freedoms in the name of “homeland security.” We don’t need to be experts in the myriad topics above, but we must pay attention. We must be vigilant, always aware of what it happening around us.

    If we are not, we shall have no recourse when our liberties are gone, because it will be us who will have frivolously given them away. Evil will have triumphed, and it will not have been the result of a fight — it will be because we have simply done nothing.

    //

    If you liked that, then try these…

    don’t forget

    luminaries and black holes

    kale alloiosis

    Email This Post Email This Post +++ Print This Post Print This Post +++ Now that's del.icio.us.

    iraq = $12 billion/month

    On Netscape.com this morning I was naturally intruiged when I saw these two headlines at the top of the heap:

    Of course the first thought in my head was how these two items were obviously connected, but as I went into the Iraq article I found a poll. I voted, and the results, while not surprising, still stunned me with their overwhelming one-sidedness. (I took this snapshot at about 9:17am today.)

    I’m no statistician, but I think a sampling of that size is considered pretty accurate.

    I actually posted this $12 billion figure before, back in July of ‘07. Of course it’s always a good reminder, though, as I don’t really feel that money coming out of my wallet, although, of course, it is. And yours, too. (We’ve been rather brilliantly conditioned by the government to think that it’s OK that they take it from us in the first place, don’t you think?)

    A little further down the Iraq article, I found these paragraphs, which I found most profound:

    These numbers don’t include the war’s cost to the rest of the world.

    In Iraq itself, the 2003 U.S.-led invasion [included] devastating air bombardments and the looting and arson that followed, severely damaged electricity and other utilities, the oil industry, countless factories, hospitals, schools and other underpinnings of an economy.

    ‘No one has tried to calculate the economic damage done to Iraq,’ said spokesman Niels Buenemann of the International Monetary Fund, which closely tracks national economies. But millions of Iraqis have been left without jobs, and hundreds of thousands of professionals, managers and other middle-class citizens have fled the country.

    I’ve said it before, and I’ll say it again: what are we doing?

    One more quote from the article “Defining Victory Downward” by Slate writer Michael Kinsley:

    Why was President Bush’s decision a year ago to send another 30,000 troops to Iraq called the “surge”? I don’t know who invented this label, but the word surge evokes images of the sea: a wave that sweeps in, and then sweeps back out again. The second part was crucial. What made the surge different from your ordinary troop deployment was that it was temporary. In fact, the surge was presented as part of a larger plan for troop withdrawal. It was also, implicitly, part of a deal between Bush and the majority of Americans who want out. The deal was: just let me have a few more soldiers to get Baghdad under control, and then everybody, or almost everybody, can pack up and come home.

    In other words: you have to increase the troops in order to reduce them. This is so perverse on its face that it begins to sound zenlike and brilliant, like something out of Sun Tzu’s The Art of War. And in Gen. David Petraeus, the administration conjured up its own Sun Tzu, a brilliant military strategist.

    [But] the test is simple, and built into the concept of a surge: has it allowed us to reduce troop levels to below where they were when it started? The answer is no. The proper comparison isn’t to the situation a year ago. It’s to the situation before we got there.

    Imagine that you had been told in 2003 that when George W. Bush finished his second term, dozens of American soldiers and hundreds of Iraqis would be dying violently every month; that a major American goal would be getting the Iraqi government to temper its “de-Baathification” campaign so that Saddam Hussein’s former henchmen could start running things again (because they know how); and “only” 100,000 American troops would be needed to sustain this equilibrium.

    You might have several words to describe this situation, but success would not be one of them.”

    //

    If you liked that, then try these…

    ann coulter hates you

    broken

    total eclipse of the soul

    Email This Post Email This Post +++ Print This Post Print This Post +++ Now that's del.icio.us.

    light enough to dance

    Hey everyone, sorry about the lack of posts lately — I’ve been pretty busy, and as much as you want some pithy comment about Ron Paul (he’s not giving up, btw) or a frighteningly dismal prediction for the economy (American employers reportedly slashed 63,000 jobs in February; the most in 5 years), all I have for you today is a wonderful quote by the brilliant Anne Lamott:

    “I think joy and sweetness and affection are a spiritual path. We’re here to know God, to love and serve God, and to be blown away by the beauty and miracle of nature. You just have to get rid of so much baggage to be light enough to dance, to sing, to play. You don’t have time to carry grudges; you don’t have time to cling to the need to be right.”

    How can you not love her?

    Check out the full interview with the Washington Times here.

    //

    Email This Post Email This Post +++ Print This Post Print This Post +++ Now that's del.icio.us.